French Polynesia vs Monaco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- French Polynesia
- Monaco
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 0.8766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.0398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Monaco ahead.
Globally, French Polynesia ranks 49th and Monaco ranks 50th of 206 countries.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.