Congo vs Libya: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Congo
- Libya
How they compare
Congo currently reports -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Libya, a difference of 0.0212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.
Globally, Congo ranks 177th and Libya ranks 179th of 206 countries.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.