Fiji vs Rwanda: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time
- Fiji
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 56.33 scale 0-100 against 55.95 scale 0-100 in Fiji, a difference of 0.375 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Fiji ahead.
Globally, Fiji ranks 103rd and Rwanda ranks 102nd of 182 countries.
Individual pages
About this data
The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.