China vs Mongolia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- China
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -0.0707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in China, a difference of 0.0005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was China ahead.
Globally, China ranks 99th and Mongolia ranks 98th of 204 countries.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.