Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, RDB concessional

Suriname
0 NFL, current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 NFL, current US$
in 2024
Suriname rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
35th

Net financial flows, RDB concessional over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
05.0M10.0M15.0M198420042024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 NFL, current US$ against 0 NFL, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 NFL, current US$.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Globally, Suriname ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 94 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
106 places, 4,574 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Concessional financial flows cover disbursements made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.