Mongolia vs Rwanda: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process

Mongolia
2.5 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Rwanda
2.5 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Mongolia rank
89th
Rwanda rank
89th

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time

  • Mongolia
  • Rwanda
0123200720142022

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 2.5 1=low to 5=high against 2.5 1=low to 5=high in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.

Globally, Mongolia ranks 89th and Rwanda ranks 89th of 156 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.