Cyprus vs Namibia: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process

Cyprus
2.9 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Namibia
2.8 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Cyprus rank
55th
Namibia rank
58th

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time

  • Cyprus
  • Namibia
0123200720142022

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 2.9 1=low to 5=high against 2.8 1=low to 5=high in Namibia, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Globally, Cyprus ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 58th of 156 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.