Libya vs Madagascar: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments

Libya
1.8 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Madagascar
2 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Libya rank
153rd
Madagascar rank
150th

Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments over time

  • Libya
  • Madagascar
0123200720142022

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 2 1=low to 5=high against 1.8 1=low to 5=high in Libya, a difference of 0.2 1=low to 5=high.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Madagascar ahead.

Globally, Libya ranks 153rd and Madagascar ranks 150th of 156 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.