Guyana vs Malawi: CPIA structural policies cluster average

Guyana
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Malawi
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Guyana rank
33rd
Malawi rank
33rd

CPIA structural policies cluster average over time

  • Guyana
  • Malawi
01234200520152025

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Malawi, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malawi ahead.

Globally, Guyana ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 33rd of 84 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.