Armenia vs Rwanda: CPIA structural policies cluster average

Armenia
4.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Rwanda
4.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Armenia rank
2nd
Rwanda rank
3rd

CPIA structural policies cluster average over time

  • Armenia
  • Rwanda
01234200520152025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 4.33 1=low to 6=high against 4.33 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Globally, Armenia ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 84 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.