Eritrea vs Sudan: CPIA economic management cluster average

Eritrea
1.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sudan
1.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Eritrea rank
81st
Sudan rank
81st

CPIA economic management cluster average over time

  • Eritrea
  • Sudan
0123200520152025

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 1.5 1=low to 6=high against 1.5 1=low to 6=high in Sudan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Globally, Eritrea ranks 81st and Sudan ranks 81st of 84 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.